

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
		
	<channel>
		<title>RSS Feeds :: Search Geeks - Forums > SEO : Topics : State of Washington Sues SEO Firm</title>
	<!--<atom:link href="http://www.searchgeeks.org" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />-->
		<description>Search Engine Optimization, Marketing, Tools and Toys</description>
		<link>http://www.searchgeeks.org</link>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:02:34 -0500</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:26:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<generator>MSSTI v0.0.1 - (C) 2008 leviatan21 - http://www.mssti.com/</generator>
		<copyright>Copyright : (c) RSS Feeds :: Search Geeks - Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:02:34 -0500</copyright>
		<dc:creator>searchgeeksorg@gmail.com (Search Geeks)</dc:creator>

		
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Re: State of Washington Sues SEO Firm</title>
			<link>http://www.searchgeeks.org/post231.html#p231</link>
				<description><![CDATA[HI Barty!<br /><br />Sorry I didn't see your post till today...<br /><br
/>Always have your clients sign an agreement before you start work. Here
are a couple of samples:<br /><br
/>"http://www.seo-scoop.com/2005/08/22/sample-seo-contract/" rel="nofollow"
onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"" rel="nofollow<br /><br
/>"http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/seo-contract-template-a-verbal-contract-isnt-worth-the-paper-its-written-on"
rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;""
rel="nofollow<p>Statistics : Posted by <a href="http://www.searchgeeks.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=53">maruschka</a> &bull; on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:09 pm &bull; Replies 6 &bull; Views 138</p><hr />]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[HI Barty!<br /><br />Sorry I didn't see your post till today...<br /><br
/>Always have your clients sign an agreement before you start work. Here
are a couple of samples:<br /><br
/>"http://www.seo-scoop.com/2005/08/22/sample-seo-contract/" rel="nofollow"
onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"" rel="nofollow<br /><br
/>"http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/seo-contract-template-a-verbal-contract-isnt-worth-the-paper-its-written-on"
rel="nofollow" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;""
rel="nofollow]]></content:encoded>
					<category domain="http://www.searchgeeks.org/viewforum.php?f=3"><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[53]]></dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2009-01-06T21:24:38-06:00</dc:date>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgeeks.org/post231.html#p231</guid>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title>Re: State of Washington Sues SEO Firm</title>
			<link>http://www.searchgeeks.org/post196.html#p196</link>
				<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><div><cite>maruschka wrote:</cite>Every technique I use or
recommend for customers is white hat, and I consider myself to be a very
patient, ethical person who doesn't overpromise. I'd hate to have the state
come after me because of some irrational, angry
customers.</div></blockquote><br /><br />Maruschka, this is something that
troubles me, because I also try to practice good SEO techniques, but
clients always expect miracles.  They are always disappointed that they
don't get bigger and faster results even though I never purposely increase
their expectations.<br /><br />Is there a guide like a template that can
show me how to write a contract to set expectations by the client and to
also protect myself?<p>Statistics : Posted by <a href="http://www.searchgeeks.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=60">barty</a> &bull; on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:09 pm &bull; Replies 6 &bull; Views 138</p><hr />]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><div><cite>maruschka wrote:</cite>Every technique I use or
recommend for customers is white hat, and I consider myself to be a very
patient, ethical person who doesn't overpromise. I'd hate to have the state
come after me because of some irrational, angry
customers.</div></blockquote><br /><br />Maruschka, this is something that
troubles me, because I also try to practice good SEO techniques, but
clients always expect miracles.  They are always disappointed that they
don't get bigger and faster results even though I never purposely increase
their expectations.<br /><br />Is there a guide like a template that can
show me how to write a contract to set expectations by the client and to
also protect myself?]]></content:encoded>
					<category domain="http://www.searchgeeks.org/viewforum.php?f=3"><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[60]]></dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2008-12-30T06:40:20-06:00</dc:date>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgeeks.org/post196.html#p196</guid>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title>Re: State of Washington Sues SEO Firm</title>
			<link>http://www.searchgeeks.org/post167.html#p167</link>
				<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.searchgeeks.org/img/owned1.jpg" alt="Image" /><br
/><br />...sorry, not exceptionally appropriate, but I've been dying to use
it somewhere.  <img
src="http://www.searchgeeks.org/images/smilies//man1.gif" alt=":1:"
title="1" /><p>Statistics : Posted by <a href="http://www.searchgeeks.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">Steven</a> &bull; on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:09 pm &bull; Replies 6 &bull; Views 138</p><hr />]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.searchgeeks.org/img/owned1.jpg" alt="Image" /><br
/><br />...sorry, not exceptionally appropriate, but I've been dying to use
it somewhere.  <img
src="http://www.searchgeeks.org/images/smilies//man1.gif" alt=":1:"
title="1" />]]></content:encoded>
					<category domain="http://www.searchgeeks.org/viewforum.php?f=3"><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[2]]></dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2008-11-30T08:26:32-06:00</dc:date>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgeeks.org/post167.html#p167</guid>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title>Re: State of Washington Sues SEO Firm</title>
			<link>http://www.searchgeeks.org/post130.html#p130</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Don't get me started on what sales reps will say! This company probably
deserves the lawsuit, from what I've read, but it will be interesting.<br
/><br />This is entertaining... from <a
href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/272/RipOff0272941.htm"
onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow"
class="postlink">Ripoff Report</a>. Haha!<br /><br />p.s. Hey Ripoff
Report, your website needs some SEO!<p>Statistics : Posted by <a href="http://www.searchgeeks.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=53">maruschka</a> &bull; on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:09 pm &bull; Replies 6 &bull; Views 138</p><hr />]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't get me started on what sales reps will say! This company probably
deserves the lawsuit, from what I've read, but it will be interesting.<br
/><br />This is entertaining... from <a
href="http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/272/RipOff0272941.htm"
onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" rel="nofollow"
class="postlink">Ripoff Report</a>. Haha!<br /><br />p.s. Hey Ripoff
Report, your website needs some SEO!]]></content:encoded>
					<category domain="http://www.searchgeeks.org/viewforum.php?f=3"><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[53]]></dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2008-11-14T16:24:22-06:00</dc:date>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgeeks.org/post130.html#p130</guid>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title>Re: State of Washington Sues SEO Firm</title>
			<link>http://www.searchgeeks.org/post129.html#p129</link>
				<description><![CDATA[Well, apparently there are 90 angry, irrational customers that files
separate complaints.<br /><br />To your point, maybe they weren't doing
their job very well.  But, it will be interesting to hear what the clients
thought they were getting vs what was sold to them.  I've heard sales
people try to sell SEO before... and it usually involves a great deal of
misunderstanding and over-promising.<p>Statistics : Posted by <a href="http://www.searchgeeks.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">Steven</a> &bull; on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:09 pm &bull; Replies 6 &bull; Views 138</p><hr />]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, apparently there are 90 angry, irrational customers that files
separate complaints.<br /><br />To your point, maybe they weren't doing
their job very well.  But, it will be interesting to hear what the clients
thought they were getting vs what was sold to them.  I've heard sales
people try to sell SEO before... and it usually involves a great deal of
misunderstanding and over-promising.]]></content:encoded>
					<category domain="http://www.searchgeeks.org/viewforum.php?f=3"><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[2]]></dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2008-11-14T15:58:47-06:00</dc:date>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgeeks.org/post129.html#p129</guid>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title>Re: State of Washington Sues SEO Firm</title>
			<link>http://www.searchgeeks.org/post126.html#p126</link>
				<description><![CDATA[ How can the state sue the SEO firm? Are they doing it on behalf of the
customers?<br /><br />I'm not saying the company shouldn't be sued, I'm
just surprised that it's the state that is suing them. I could see a class
action lawsuit, or individual lawsuits by customers who were ripped off,
but what is the state's interest in this?<br /><br />I don't know anything
about this SEO company, and they may deserve all of the criticism they're
getting, but I've had some tense conversations with unhappy customers who
refused to have any patience at all with organic SEO efforts, claiming that
what we did "just isn't working" and they're not getting any new customers.
This is after the entire process has been explained and the customer signed
an agreement that spelled it all out in detail. With some businesses, they
either didn't implement the things we recommended or sometimes they had
someone else make changes to their site that invalidated what we did. And
sometimes, especially with new sites, they jus...<p>Statistics : Posted by <a href="http://www.searchgeeks.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=53">maruschka</a> &bull; on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:09 pm &bull; Replies 6 &bull; Views 138</p><hr />]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[ How can the state sue the SEO firm? Are they doing it on behalf of the
customers?<br /><br />I'm not saying the company shouldn't be sued, I'm
just surprised that it's the state that is suing them. I could see a class
action lawsuit, or individual lawsuits by customers who were ripped off,
but what is the state's interest in this?<br /><br />I don't know anything
about this SEO company, and they may deserve all of the criticism they're
getting, but I've had some tense conversations with unhappy customers who
refused to have any patience at all with organic SEO efforts, claiming that
what we did "just isn't working" and they're not getting any new customers.
This is after the entire process has been explained and the customer signed
an agreement that spelled it all out in detail. With some businesses, they
either didn't implement the things we recommended or sometimes they had
someone else make changes to their site that invalidated what we did. And
sometimes, especially with new sites, they jus...]]></content:encoded>
					<category domain="http://www.searchgeeks.org/viewforum.php?f=3"><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[53]]></dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2008-11-14T14:47:09-06:00</dc:date>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgeeks.org/post126.html#p126</guid>
		</item>
			<item>
			<title>State of Washington Sues SEO Firm</title>
			<link>http://www.searchgeeks.org/post125.html#p125</link>
				<description><![CDATA[  "http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/35218"<br /><br /><blockquote
class="uncited"><div> These are the kinds of charges that can send a
company's customers fleeing ... and certainly should if they're proven to
be true.<br /><br />The State of Washington has filed suit (.pdf) against a
Redmond-based search engine optimization and Web services outfit that has
done business under the names Visible.net, Captures.com and
WebMarketingSource.com. In essence, the state attorney general contends
that these entities have ripped off their mostly mom-and-pop clientele
through a pattern of unfulfilled performance promises and financial
shenanigans. While the clients may be on the smaller end of the spectrum,
they have been forking over real money, with initial startup charges
ranging from $3,750 to $9,750, plus a monthly fee of $40 to $100.<br /><br
/>The attorney general has charged the company and its owner, Gilbert
Walker, with:<br /><br />        * Misrepresenting th</div></blockquote>...<p>Statistics : Posted by <a href="http://www.searchgeeks.org/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=2">Steven</a> &bull; on Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:09 pm &bull; Replies 6 &bull; Views 138</p><hr />]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[  "http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/35218"<br /><br /><blockquote
class="uncited"><div> These are the kinds of charges that can send a
company's customers fleeing ... and certainly should if they're proven to
be true.<br /><br />The State of Washington has filed suit (.pdf) against a
Redmond-based search engine optimization and Web services outfit that has
done business under the names Visible.net, Captures.com and
WebMarketingSource.com. In essence, the state attorney general contends
that these entities have ripped off their mostly mom-and-pop clientele
through a pattern of unfulfilled performance promises and financial
shenanigans. While the clients may be on the smaller end of the spectrum,
they have been forking over real money, with initial startup charges
ranging from $3,750 to $9,750, plus a monthly fee of $40 to $100.<br /><br
/>The attorney general has charged the company and its owner, Gilbert
Walker, with:<br /><br />        * Misrepresenting th</div></blockquote>...]]></content:encoded>
					<category domain="http://www.searchgeeks.org/viewforum.php?f=3"><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[2]]></dc:creator>
			<dc:date>2008-11-14T13:09:05-06:00</dc:date>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchgeeks.org/post125.html#p125</guid>
		</item>
	
	</channel>
</rss>